THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PUBLIC INFORMATION OPENNESS AND ICT DEVELOPMENT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/jitet.v12i2.4238

Abstract Views: 598 File Views: 166

Abstract

The relationship between Information and Communication Technology (ICT) development and the level of Public Information Openness (KIP) holds significant implications for inclusive and sustainable societal development. This study employs statistical analysis, including Pearson correlation, to examine this relationship across Indonesian provinces in 2022. Findings indicate a positive correlation between ICT development and KIP. Access to ICT infrastructure and ICT usage show significant correlations with IKIP levels across various provinces. Provinces with better ICT development generally exhibit higher KIP levels. However, the relationship with ICT skills is comparatively weaker, indicating other influencing factors on ICT literacy within the community. The conclusion drawn from this research is that ICT development positively contributes to enhancing Public Information Transparency in Indonesia. Therefore, further efforts are needed to support equitable ICT development, enhance digital literacy, and strengthen public information transparency, enabling the population to effectively harness information and communication technology

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Harun Al Azies, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Study Program in Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science
Research Center for Materials Informatics, Faculty of Computer Science

Ishak Bintang Dikaputra, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

Study Program in Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science

References

J. L. Ngenzi, R. E. Scott, and M. Mars, “Information and communication technology to enhance continuing professional development (CPD) and continuing medical education (CME) for Rwanda: a scoping review of reviews,” BMC Med Educ, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/S12909-021-02607-W/TABLES/1.

N. Roztocki, P. Soja, and H. R. Weistroffer, “The role of information and communication technologies in socioeconomic development: towards a multi-dimensional framework*,” Inf Technol Dev, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 171–183, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2019.1596654.

M. Kuziemski and G. Misuraca, “AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings,” Telecomm Policy, vol. 44, no. 6, p. 101976, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.TELPOL.2020.101976.

H. Hilman and P. Utami, “Public Information Openness Strategy in Maintaining Quality and Accountability of 2024 Elections in Banten Province,” International Journal of Social Service and Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 236–243, 2023, doi: 10.46799/IJSSR.V3I1.240.

L. Schmidthuber, A. Ingrams, and D. Hilgers, “Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity,” Public Adm Rev, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 91–109, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1111/PUAR.13298.

B. Ferede, J. Elen, W. Van Petegem, A. B. Hunde, and K. Goeman, “Determinants of instructors’ educational ICT use in Ethiopian higher education,” Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 917–936, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S10639-021-10606-Z/TABLES/5.

F. Lyall, “International Communications: The International Telecommunication Union and the Universal Postal Union,” International Communications: The International Telecommunication Union and the Universal Postal Union, pp. 1–344, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.4324/9781315589336/INTERNATIONAL-COMMUNICATIONS-FRANCIS-LYALL.

S. I. Cioacă, S. E. Cristache, M. Vuţă, E. Marin, and M. Vuţă, “Assessing the Impact of ICT Sector on Sustainable Development in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis Using Panel Data,” Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 592, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 592, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.3390/SU12020592.

F. F. Syeh, A. S. Amir, and N. Arya, “Implementasi Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Pada Situs Web Pemerintah Daerah Se-Sulawesi Selatan,” Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik dan Komunikasi Bisnis, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 209–218, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.24853/PK.6.2.209-218.

A. Setiaman, D. Sugiana, and J. N. Mahameruaji, “Implementasi Kebijakan Keterbukaan Informasi Publik,” Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 196–205, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.24198/JKK.V1I2.6044.

S. Nababan, “Strategi Pelayanan Informasi untuk meningkatkan Keterbukaan Informasi Publik,” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 166–180, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.31315/JIK.V17I2.3694.

R. N. Wilantari, S. Latifah, W. Wibowo, and H. Al Azies, “Additive mixed modeling of impact of investment, labor, education and information technology on regional income disparity: An empirical analysis using the statistics Indonesia dataset,” Data Brief, vol. 45, p. 108619, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.DIB.2022.108619.

S. Adrian et al., “The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, flows and the circular economy potential,” Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential, no. July, pp. 1–119, Jul. 2020, Accessed: Sep. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://ewastemonitor.info/

J. Benesty, J. Chen, Y. Huang, and I. Cohen, “Pearson correlation coefficient,” Springer Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 2, pp. 1–4, 2009, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5/COVER.

T. Olivoto, M. Nardino, and V. J. Szareski, “Pearson Correlation Coefficients and Accuracy of Path Analysis Used In Maize Breeding: A Critical Review”, Accessed: Feb. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://www.journalcra.com

T. Gnambs, “A Brief Note on the Standard Error of the Pearson Correlation,” Collabra Psychol, vol. 9, no. 1, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1525/COLLABRA.87615/197169.

C. Jebarathinam, D. Home, and U. Sinha, “Pearson correlation coefficient as a measure for certifying and quantifying high-dimensional entanglement,” Phys Rev A (Coll Park), vol. 101, no. 2, p. 022112, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVA.101.022112/FIGURES/4/MEDIUM.

R. W. Emerson, “Causation and Pearson’s correlation coefficient,” J Vis Impair Blind, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 242–244, May 2015, doi: 10.1177/0145482X1510900311/ASSET/0145482X1510900311.FP.PNG_V03.

R. W. Cooksey, “Descriptive Statistics for Summarising Data,” Illustrating Statistical Procedures: Finding Meaning in Quantitative Data, pp. 61–139, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-2537-7_5.

P. Mishra, U. Singh, C. M. Pandey, P. Mishra, and G. Pandey, “Application of Student’s t-test, Analysis of Variance, and Covariance,” Ann Card Anaesth, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 407, 2019, doi: 10.4103/ACA.ACA_94_19.

P. Waldmann, “On the use of the pearson correlation coefficient for model evaluation in genome-wide prediction,” Front Genet, vol. 10, no. SEP, p. 469960, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.3389/FGENE.2019.00899/BIBTEX.

S. Afyouni, S. M. Smith, and T. E. Nichols, “Effective degrees of freedom of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient under autocorrelation,” Neuroimage, vol. 199, pp. 609–625, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2019.05.011.

W. Feng, Q. Zhu, J. Zhuang, and S. Yu, “An expert recommendation algorithm based on Pearson correlation coefficient and FP-growth,” Cluster Comput, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 7401–7412, May 2019, doi: 10.1007/S10586-017-1576-Y/TABLES/9.

C. He, B. Mishra, Q. Shi, Y. Zhao, D. Lin, and X. Wang, “Correlations between mineral composition and mechanical properties of granite using digital image processing and discrete element method,” Int J Min Sci Technol, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 949–962, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.IJMST.2023.06.003.

R. A. Armstrong, “Should Pearson’s correlation coefficient be avoided?,” Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 316–327, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1111/OPO.12636.

E. Saccenti, M. H. W. B. Hendriks, and A. K. Smilde, “Corruption of the Pearson correlation coefficient by measurement error and its estimation, bias, and correction under different error models,” Scientific Reports 2020 10:1, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57247-4.

T. Budiwati et al., “Analisis Korelasi Pearson Untuk Unsur-Unsur Kimia Air Hujan Di Bandung,” Jurnal Sains Dirgantara, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 100–112, Dec. 2010, Accessed: Sep. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.lapan.go.id/index.php/jurnal_sains/article/view/1118

Y. Liu, Y. Mu, K. Chen, Y. Li, and J. Guo, “Daily Activity Feature Selection in Smart Homes Based on Pearson Correlation Coefficient,” Neural Process Lett, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1771–1787, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/S11063-019-10185-8/FIGURES/13.

D. Edelmann, T. F. Móri, and G. J. Székely, “On relationships between the Pearson and the distance correlation coefficients,” Stat Probab Lett, vol. 169, p. 108960, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.SPL.2020.108960.

N. Kurniawati et al., “Indeks Keterbukaan Ruang Publik Kota Makassar (Studi Kasus Pantai Losari, Tanjung Bayang Dan Pantai Akkarena),” Plano Madani: Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 134–144, Nov. 2021, Accessed: Sep. 30, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/planomadani/article/view/14843

Downloads

Published

2024-04-02

How to Cite

Al Azies, H., & Dikaputra, I. B. (2024). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PUBLIC INFORMATION OPENNESS AND ICT DEVELOPMENT. Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknik Elektro Terapan, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.23960/jitet.v12i2.4238

Issue

Section

Articles