ANALISIS PENGGUNAAN APLIKASI LIVEWIRE DALAM SIMULASI RANGKAIAN ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN
Abstract
The main focus of this research is actually simple: to determine how much influence Livewire software has on students' conceptual understanding, motivation, and engagement when learning electronic circuit simulations. Coincidentally, we sampled 81 D3 Electronic Engineering students from Sriwijaya State Polytechnic. We used a descriptive quantitative method. All field data was collected through pre-tests, post-tests, Likert-scale questionnaires, and direct observation during class. The obtained figures were then calculated using descriptive statistics to find average scores and percentages. From this, it's clear that the students responded very positively to Livewire. Interestingly, they found the software easy to operate, made previously complicated theories more understandable, and stimulated their enthusiasm for learning. The classroom atmosphere also became less boring because it was more interactive. Most importantly, their test scores improved after using Livewire. However, honestly, this research still has shortcomings. We haven't had the opportunity to compare Livewire with other similar simulation applications, and after all, the visualization on a computer screen is bound to be different from the actual conditions when holding the equipment in the lab. In essence, Livewire is an excellent starting point for learning electronics simulations. We recommend making this application a mandatory component or a bridge before students are actually involved in practical work in the laboratory.
Downloads
References
S. M. Alessi and S. R. Trollip, Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development, 3rd ed. Boston, MA, USA: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
R. E. Mayer, Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press, 2000.
R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1998.
B. Hermawan, A. Faqih, dan G. Dwilestari, "Implementasi Aplikasi Berbasis Petualangan Pembelajaran Augmented Reality untuk Meningkatkan Interaktivitas di SMAN 1 Dukupuntang," JITET (Jurnal Informatika dan Teknik Elektro Terapan), vol. 13, no. 1, hlm. 609-618, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.23960/jitet.v13i1.5688.
J. Piaget, The Psychology of Intelligence. London, U.K.: Routledge, 1950.
L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
D. H. Jonassen, Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Merrill/Prentice Hall, 2000
D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1984.
J. Biggs and C. Tang, Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th ed. Maidenhead, U.K.: McGraw-Hill Education, 2011.
B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York, NY, USA: Longman, 1956.
R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding student differences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 2005.
P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, “Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge,” Teachers College Record, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1017–1054, 2006.
P. A. Ertmer and A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, “Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 255–284, 2010
K. F. Hew and T. Brush, “Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 223–252, 2007
N. M. Seel, Ed., Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 2012.
J. W. Nilsson and S. A. Riedel, Electric Circuits, 10th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2011.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
R. Likert, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes,” Archives of Psychology, vol. 22, no. 140, pp. 1–55, 1932.
Sugiyono, Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2019.
S. Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3rd ed. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bumi Aksara, 2012.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
