Hubungan Pengujian Cbr Metode Tumbukan Dengan Alat Uji Cbr Metode Tekanan Berdasarkan Uji Pemadatan Standard

Authors

  • Devrisvansyah Irwan
  • Andius Dasa Putra
  • Aminudin Syah
  • Iswan Iswan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23960/jrsdd.v9i3.1993

Abstract Views: 142 File Views: 88 File Views: 0

Abstract

The importance of soil as construction material needs to be considered carefully. With various soil conditions, a physical test is required to discover the characteristics of the soil and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test in a laboratory to determine the bearing capacity of the basic land (subgrade). This research was conducted to assess the suitability of the CBR test value with two different compaction tools.

The results of the CBR test with the collision method without immersion resulted in the design CBR value of 7.7% and the CBR value of the immersion sample of 3.6%. Meanwhile, the CBR test using a pressure modification device, the CBR values obtained in the samples not immersed at a pressure of 3 MPa, 6 MPa, 9 MPa, and 12 MPa, were 4.2%, 6.8%, 9.8%, and 11.4%. The CBR valuesfor the immersion samples were 2.95%, 4.2%, 4.45%, and 4.56%. The results obtained from the design CBR value of the pressure method with a pressure of 6MPa which is closest to the collision CBR value with a difference of 0.9% for no immersion and 0.6% for immersion. The assumption that the difference between the two methods is due to the compaction energy of 6 MPa strength is not the same as the energy produced from the use of hammer energy according to ASTM D 698, Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ASTM D 698, 2008. est Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Efforts (12 400 ft-lbf/ft33 (600 kN-m/m)), (SNI 1742:2008, Cara uji kepadatan ringan untuk tanah).

Bowles, 1984. No TitlePhysical and Geotehcnical Propertiies od Soils, Second Edition, McGraw. Second Edi. New York.

Bowles, J.E., 1991. Sifat-sifat Fisis dan Geoteknis Tanah (Mekanika Tanah). Jakarta.

Chairullah, B., 2011. tabilisasi Tanah Lempung Lunak Untuk Material Tanah Dasar S ub Grade Dan Sub Base Jalan Raya.

Das, B.., 1995. Mekanika Tanah (Prinsip-Prinsip Rekayasa Geoteknis) Jilid I. Jakarta.

Prihatono, Y., 2011. PemadatanTanah [online]. Available from: https://yogoz.wordpress.com/2011/01/31/pemadatan-anah-2.

Putra, M.D.H., 2017. Pengaruh Perbaikan Tanah Lempung Ekspansif Dengan Metode Deep Soil Mixing Pada Berbagai Kadar Air Lapangan Tanah Asli Terhadap Nilai Cbr Dan Pengembangan. Malang.

Tanzil, A.., 1991. Sifat-sifat Lempung Kembang dan Permasalahanya, Makalah Teknik pada Konferensi Regional Teknik jalan ke I Wilayah Barat. Palembang.

Verhoef, P.N.W., 1994. Geologi Untuk Teknik Sipil. Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-12

How to Cite

Irwan, D., Putra, A. D., Syah, A., & Iswan, I. (2021). Hubungan Pengujian Cbr Metode Tumbukan Dengan Alat Uji Cbr Metode Tekanan Berdasarkan Uji Pemadatan Standard. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil Dan Desain, 9(3), Hal. 571 – 580. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrsdd.v9i3.1993

Issue

Section

Makalah Ilmiah Edisi September 2021